Spring of Bette Davis: Now, Voyager

On June 12, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Spring of Bette2 Comments

I have been watching Bette Davis movies for spring and clearly, it is stretching a bit into summer.

This week I am writing about Now, Voyager — a movie that chronicles the life of a mentally abused woman whose narcissistic mother held her back and down for years.

It was released in 1942, which was in an era where movies were being geared toward women, left home during World War II. It was a feminist-yet-not-feminist movie that was ahead of its time in some ways and right in line with the times in others.

Bette portrays Charlotte Val, an abused woman who only escapes the horror of her mother (Gladys Cooper) when a psychiatrist named Dr. Jaquith (portrayed by Claude Rains) sees what is happening and suggests Charlotte come to a sanatorium. His hope is to unravel the neurotic mess caused by her domineering mother.

This movie starts with Bette looking very dowdy and old, with a unibrow. Online, it also says she was overweight but…well, that wasn’t what I think of as overweight. Different standards back then, of course.

We learn right off the bat that Charlotte’s mother is a domineering, crazy lady. Charlotte has three older brothers and was the “unwanted child” that her mother felt was a burden.

Charlotte’s sister-in-law, Lisa, (Ilka Chase) brings Dr. Jaquith to meet Charlotte, and I can’t help feeling she did this to try to help Charlotte escape her mother.

Ilka also has a teenage daughter (Bonita Granville, who was also in the old Nancy Drew movies) who laughs at her spinster aunt. She is not a lovely girl, but she does improve somewhat later on.

When Charlotte leaves the sanitorium — thinner, more beautiful, and full of more confidence than when she went in — Dr. Jaquith and Lisa suggest she delay her return to her mother and instead go on a cruise, which she does. There she meets Jerry (Paul Henreid), who is on a business trip, and who she falls in love with but soon learns is married, though unhappily. They end up pushed together a lot on this trip, and when they are involved in a car crash while going to see the sights on a stop in Rio de Janeiro, they spend the night together, cuddling (maybe more? Hmmm…), and then spend five days together after missing the ship.

Charlotte eventually catches up with the ship to return home after she and Jerry admit they can’t be together because of his marriage.

This movie was very good, suspenseful and fascinating, but I am going to share one annoyance for me — and please keep in mind that this was most likely a me issue and is probably due to some sensory overload issues I’ve been having as I get older — the music that constantly plays in the background of every single scene and never lets up was very distracting for me. I hesitate to even share this lest one of the enthusiastic Bette fans who have found my movie clips on social media come here and berate me, but the music, while very good, was very distracting for me. Maybe it was the sound on my TV? I have no idea.

I searched online to see if this bothered anyone else and it did (thank you Reddit and other forums), but I also read that this was to set the mood of the movie and to show how intense things kept getting for Charlotte throughout various stages of her breaking away from her mother.

That makes sense, but it was no less annoying for me. At times, I had trouble concentrating on the dialogue because of how prevalent the music was. It was a 2-hour movie and the music never, or at least rarely, stopped. The score, composed by Max Steiner, won an Oscar, though, so this is apparently just a “me” issue.

Like many of Bette’s movies, Now, Voyager is a melodrama, and melodramatic music is to be expected.

The blog The Hollywood Garden shared that Steiner scored 21 of Bette’s movies; she was a huge fan of his. Rightly so. The music is great — just a bit too great in some scenes where it was more prominent than the voices to me.

“In 1939, during the making of Dark Victory (dir. Edmund Goulding), Bette stopped the climactic scene and asked Goulding if Steiner was going to score the picture,” The Hollywood Garden wrote. “He said he didn’t know and asked what the big deal was. She famously said, ‘Either I’m going to climb those stairs or Max Steiner is going to climb those stairs. But I’ll be g******** if Max Steiner and I are going to climb those stairs together!’”

But, as usual, I have digressed a bit. Let’s get back to the rest of the movie.

From the first moment that Dr. Jaquith takes Charlotte from her mother’s home, I was rooting for her.

I was hoping she would break away, tell that old bitty to jump off a bridge, and start her own life. Some of this did happen, but then Charlotte was in a new cage — one of a mistress who can’t really have the man she wants because he’s already married with children. Ironically, one of his children, a daughter, is very similar to Charlotte and is treated as poorly by her mother as Charlotte was by hers.

That will come into play in the movie, of course.

Bette showed her true range in this film. I almost forgot she was Bette. Instead of being brash and bold and yelling, like she was in many of her other films, she was withdrawn, subdued, quiet, and confused during the beginning of Now, Voyager, with a later transformation into a bold and determined woman.

It was fascinating to watch the process of where Charlotte started and where she eventually ended up.

I’ve almost forgotten to mention that this movie is based on the book by Olive Higgins Prouty. It was the third novel in a series about the wealthy Vale family of Boston and was released in 1941.

Bette was not the first choice for this film, which was directed by Michael Curtiz after the first director, Edmund Goulding, became ill.

Warner Bros. Production Head Hal Wallis first looked to Irene Dunne, who had starred in another melodramatic film, Love Affair, with Charles Boyer, a couple of years before. Also considered were Norma Shearer and Ginger Rogers.

None of those women were available in the end, and Bette was in the middle of yet another blow-up and battle with Jack Warner, head of Warner Bros.

When a friend at the studio told Bette that the rights had been obtained to Prouty’s novel, though, she began to lobby for the role. She was a native Bostonian and would understand the role more than other actresses, she said.

Warner said Bette wasn’t attractive enough to go from an ugly duckling to a glamorous woman.

Bette countered that her modest appearance would appeal to all women around the nation instead of a Hollywood beauty, and Wallis agreed, thus convincing Warner to cave and give her the role.

One famous scene or recurring action that came in this film was when Paul Henreid lit two cigarettes in his mouth and handed one to Bette’s character. It was a move that followed Paul around for years afterwards, with fans offering to light his cigarettes that way.

I rented this one, but I believe it is streaming on various sites.

After I finish one more Bette Davis movie, The Petrified Forrest, I’ll be taking a break from a set movie/actor theme until Autumn, when I will be watching Jimmy Stewart movies.

The movies I’ve watched for this feature include:

Now, Voyager

The Petrified Forrest

You can find a suggestion of Bette Davis movies to watch here.

_____

Sources or further reading:

https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/6703-now-voyager-we-have-the-stars

https://theoldhollywoodgarden.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/max-steiner-and-now-voyager-1942/

https://www.tcm.com/articles/1074847/now-voyager

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/aug/04/now-voyager-review-bette-daviss-sublime-sex-free-act-of-sublimation

If you want to find clips and thoughts about vintage movies and TV, you can visit me on Instagram on my Nostalgically Thinking Account (https://www.instagram.com/nostalgically_thinking/) or on my YouTube account Nostalgically and Bookishly Thinking here: https://www.youtube.com/@nostaglicandbookish

You can also find me on Instagram and YouTube and Facebook.

Notice: This post may contain affiiate links. If you purchase the product from these links I will receive a small compensation at no extra charge to you.

Spring of Bette: The Letter (1940)

On May 29, 2026June 5, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions, Spring of Bette6 Comments

I’ve been watching Bette Davis movies for spring and I’m stretching a bit into summer because of some delays but … no one really cares because I think two people (including me) read these posts. Ha! But it’s still fun for me so I keep writing them.

This week I am writing about The Letter.

This one was very suspenseful and fascinating.

I wondered what the truth was and when I did know it, I wondered how everyone in the movie would figure it out.

And the ending…oof. I sort of knew it was coming and am not sure what I think about it, but I am going to not talk about it here. I’ll let some of you watch it and then you can come back and tell me what you thought.

Here is a brief description of the movie from TCM.com:

Based on a short story and play by British author W. Somerset Maugham, The Letter is the story of Leslie Crosbie, who has killed her lover and claims self-defense. But an incriminating letter exists…

I couldn’t write any better what Margarita Landazuri wrote on TCM.com about the opening sequence of this movie:

“It is a sultry, sweltering, moonlit night on a Malayan rubber plantation. The camera pans across the native workers sleeping fitfully in their hammocks, through the silent, menacing darkness. Suddenly, a shot rings out. A ghostly tropical bird, startled, flies off its perch. A man stumbles down the steps of the veranda, followed by a woman who pumps several more shots into him and drops the gun. In two wordless minutes, director William Wyler grabs the audience and sets the mood of The Letter (1940), with one of the most stunning opening sequences ever.”

This movie, released in 1940 is a remake of a 1929 movie starring Jeanne Eagels shortly before her death. It is one of the only, if not the only, surviving film she was ever in. There was a silent and a talking version with her in it released that year and it caused quite a stir with some towns in the U.S. banning it and calling it “too adult” for most audiences.

But we are talking about the 1940 version today.

This version was directed by William Wyler who Bette Davis had worked with in Jezebel and had a brief affair with (like who didn’t she have an affair with at this point?!). Davis said there was no other director who she would trust and listen to as much as Wyler.

There were a couple of major challenges to this insistence by Davis, but, overall, their close friendship did prove to be a plus for the movie.

In addition to Davis, the movie also stars:

James Stephenson (an unknown British actor at the time who was nominated for an Oscar for his performance but sadly died a year later from a heart attack), Herbert Marshall, and Victor Sen Yung as Ong Chi Seng.

Sen Yung was amazing and a pivotal part of the movie all the way through. His subtle expressions and slight raise of his voice just when needed as absolutely perfect. I’d like to find out more about him and the roles he was able to, and not to, play in Hollywood back then.

I did read that he played Hop Sing on Bonanza and I’ve never seen Bonanza but I’m guessing it was pretty stereotypical. Not sure though.

Gale Sondergaard plays an Asian woman, which was very odd, but also worked somehow. She was very intimidating and creepy but that was also enhanced with Wyler’s decision to cut the soundtrack in scenes with her, leaving only the sounds of wind or windchimes during her appearances.

Davis was extremely intense during much of the movie and her unflinching telling of the true story was chilling and unnerving. It had me gasping a couple of times but I gasped even more at her audacity at the end of the movie.

After watching all these movies with Bette, I don’t know that she is my favorite actress and sometimes I feel like she is the same person in a lot of movies, without much variety in her acting style (please, Bette fans, don’t throw things at me .. I wrote sometimes !) but she certainly commanded the screen with her presence. More so than what Bette says is how she looks in a scene. She has this subtle, and sometimes not subtle, way of cocking one eyebrow and lowering her eyelids at the same time that alerts you to an impending fit, temper tantrum, or epic take down.

This movie, much like Jezebel, showcases Bette’s ability to convey so much through just a few looks. I couldn’t take my eyes off of her and found myself saying, “Oh no you didn’t…” a lot to the screen when she was on.

This one is definitely on of hers I would recommend if you have never seen a Bette Davis movie, or one that was good at least.

Here is the opening sequence I was talking about above:

Here is an explanation on why this movie is considered noir by many film buffs

Up next I am watching Of Human Bondage, one of Bette’s most acclaimed early films.

My watch list for this feature:

The Letter

Of Human Bondage (June 2)

Now, Voyager (June 5)

The Petrified Forrest (June 11)

Sources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/18603/the-letter

https://classicforareason.com/2017/07/04/the-letter-1940/

https://classiq.me/breaking-the-rules-of-a-leading-lady-bette-davis-in-the-letter

You can also find me on Instagram and YouTube and Facebook.

Five Angela Lansbury movies I recommend

On May 28, 2026June 8, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn Movie Impresssions4 Comments

Last summer I watched Angela Lansbury movies for fun, and today I am sharing five of those movies that I recommend.

The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945)

This was Angela’s third movie and her second Oscar nomination. Spoiler alert, she did not win an Oscar but she was nominated three times. I am mentioning all three movies she was nominated for in this post, incidentally.

I had to sit and process this one for a bit and also watch a comedy or two afterward.

Wow, what a creepy, dark, and unsettling film.

Yes, unsettling is the perfect word for this movie and while I am glad to see the second film that Angela received an Oscar nomination for, I don’t plan to watch it again.

First, a quick description of the movie for those who are not familiar with it.

From TCM.com, this one-sentence description tells us what we need to know about the movie:

“A man remains young and handsome while his portrait shows the ravages of age and sin.”

The movie is based on the book of the same name by Oscar Wilde, written in 1898. There is even a moment where the main character quotes Wilde.

Starring in the film are Angela, Hurd Hatfield, George Sanders, Donna Reed, and Peter Lawford.

Dorian Gray is a young man without any family who gets mixed up with a man who is a bit of a chauvinist, cynical, jerk. This man, Lord Henry Wotton (George Sanders, who plays villains absolutely perfectly), comments on how awful it is to age when he is looking at a painting of Dorian being made by artist Basil Hallward.

Lord Henry, a man who enjoys manipulating the lives of others and talking down to women and everyone around him, says that youth is fleeting and that the pursuit of desire should be the only real goal in life. Dorian, who seems super impressionable to me, thinks about what Lord Henry has said and says that he would give his soul if the painting would grow old while he remained forever young.

Lord Henry tells him to be careful about making such a wish in front of his Egyptian statue of a cat.

Dorian then decides to explore new places, experience new things, and later he visits a bar where he watches a beautiful young woman names Sibyl Vane (Angela) performing a song called Goodbye, Little Yellow Bird. He is enamored with her and her with him.

Consider yourself warned that Goodbye, Little Yellow Bird is an earworm.

Dorian’s in love, but, again, Lord Henry is cynical and mean and tells Dorian to give Sibyl a challenge. Invite her to stay overnight, and depending on what she decides, Dorian will know if she is virtuous or not.

You’ll have to watch the movie to find out what happens.

You can read more about my thoughts on the movie here: https://lisahoweler.com/2025/08/09/summer-of-angela-the-picture-of-dorian-gray/

Gaslight (1944)

This was Angela’s first movie and also her first nomination for an Academy Award. She was 18 years old when she portrayed Nancy, the odd, boisterous and flirty housemaid of Ingrid Bergman’s character. She was nominated for best supporting actress.

A simple description of Gaslight is that it is about a woman who is made to believe she is insane.

Here is a little more from Google, though: “After the death of her famous opera-singing aunt, Paula (Ingrid Bergman) is sent to study in Italy to become a great opera singer as well. While there, she falls in love with the charming Gregory Anton (Charles Boyer). The two return to London, and Paula begins to notice strange goings-on: missing pictures, strange footsteps in the night and gaslights that dim without being touched. As she fights to retain her sanity, her new husband’s intentions come into question.”

It stars Ingrid Bergman as Paula Alquist, Charles Boyer as Gregory Anton, Angela Lansbury as Nancy Oliver, and Joseph Cotten as Brian Cameron.

Angela’s character was evil and selfish. That’s the only way I know how to describe her. She definitely was brilliant in her role because she made me so uncomfortable. If I could describe her even more succinctly, I would say “what a trashy little tart.”

In a 2000 interview with NPR’s Fresh Air, Angela recalled how the audition for Gaslight really came about.

“Well, I was introduced to the studio, which was MGM, by a young man who was being considered for the role of Dorian Gray. His name was Michael Dyne. And he arranged that the casting director would see me, this young English girl, who at that time was – I think I was 17. And I went to the studio with my mother and was interviewed for the part of Sibyl Vane in “Dorian Gray.” And the head of casting, a man called Billy Grady, came into the room while I was sitting there. He said, sort of whispered in the ear of Mr. Ballerino, the man I was seeing, you know, you should suggest that this young lady meets George Cukor, who’s trying to cast the role of the maid in “Gaslight.” And so right then and there, I was whipped off to meet George Cukor. And so, well, the rest, as they say, is history.”

I don’t want to give too much away, but this movie did have me on edge throughout the entirety. I felt such anxiety for Ingrid’s character and a lot of anger toward her husband, though I wasn’t sure what was really going on.

You can read more of my thoughts on the movie here:

https://lisahoweler.com/2025/07/04/summer-of-angela-gaslight-1944/

The Manchurian Candidate (1962)

Angela was nominated for an Oscar for best supporting actress for her performance as Eleanor Shaw and, wow, did she deserve that nomination.

First, a description of the movie from Google:

Near the end of the Korean War, a platoon of U.S. soldiers is captured by communists and brainwashed. Following the war, the platoon is returned home, and Sergeant Raymond Shaw (Laurence Harvey) is lauded as a hero by the rest of his platoon. However, the platoon commander, Captain Bennett Marco (Frank Sinatra), finds himself plagued by strange nightmares and, together with fellow soldier Allen Melvin (James Edwards), races to uncover a terrible plot.

Nothing about the character in this movie reminds me of the Angela who is in Murder She Wrote. Now, of course the woman played many roles, but I am most familiar with her on Murder She Wrote so I had to prepare myself for seeing someone completely different and that is exactly what I got. Eleanor Shaw is absolutely not Jessica Fletcher.

Eleanor Shaw is vindictive, mean, and hungry for money and power.

“It’s a horrible thing to hate your mother,” Raymond tells Bennett at one point. “I didn’t always hate her. As a child I just sort of disliked her.”

That was before she did something he could not forgive.

Eleanor is completely domineering with her second husband, Raymond’s stepfather, and a senator.

She tells him what to do, when to do it, and how to do it.

“I keep telling you not to think.” She tells him at one point in the movie. “You are very, very great at a great number of things, but thinking isn’t one of them, hon’.”

Eeek.

She gave me chills.

Here is the rest of what I thought about the movie:

https://lisahoweler.com/2025/06/16/summer-of-angela-the-manchurian-candidate/

The Pirates of Penzance (1983)

The Pirates of the Penzance is a crazy musical and a reproduction of the Joseph Papp’s Broadway production.

I will tell you upfront that halfway through the movie, I had to check that I wasn’t having a fever dream. I also realized I’m very old and my ears are in even worse condition than I thought because I had no idea what was being said in any of the songs. I even tried close captioning but because I watched it for free on YouTube, it didn’t work so well.

I also couldn’t figure out what was happening most of the time. Still, I pushed forward and ended up enjoying it in places and being utterly baffled in other places.

A description from Google:

“Frederic (Rex Smith), who has spent his formative years as a junior pirate, plans to mark his 21st birthday by breaking free from the Pirate King (Kevin Kline) and beginning his courtship of Mabel (Linda Ronstadt). But because he was born on Feb. 29, a date that only arrives every fourth year, Frederic isn’t technically 21 — and the Pirate King is still his master. Unless something gives, Frederic will soon be on a collision course with the Pirate King’s new nemesis: Mabel’s father.”

The movie starts with the people in town coming out of church, seeing the pirate ship off shore, and locking up all their doors.

Then we are on the pirate ship with Frederic and the Pirate King and the rest of the crew celebrating Frederic’s birthday. It is after all the singing that Frederic announces that now that he is 21 he can leave the ship and his service with the Pirate King.

This is when Ruth (Angela), Frederic’s nursemaid, tells him that all those years ago when his father wanted him to apprentice with a pilot and she heard “pirate” instead.

Frederic has a strong sense of duty, which is why he stayed with the pirates and committed crimes with them all those years. But now that he is no longer bound to them, he vows that when he leaves the ship, he will fight against the pirate and the criminal acts he and his crew try to commit.

“Individually, I love you all, with affection unspeakable. But collectively, I look upon you with a disgust that amounts to absolute detestation.”

Ruth wants to leave with Frederic and marry him, but Frederic isn’t so sure about it. He’s never really met other women and wants to know if Ruth is attractive. The pirate and crew assure him that she is, simply because they would like to get rid of her too.

Frederic agrees to take Ruth with him but discovers, when he sees a group of women frolicking together near a small pond, that she is not actually attractive and is instead just old.

He sends Ruth away and approaches the women, who turn out to be sisters, and asks which one of them would like to marry him.

Yeah….this musical is weird.

One thing I can say after seeing this is that Angela was so talented — it seems like there wasn’t anything she couldn’t do — acting, singing, dancing, producing, writing… wow. I’m still trying to figure out if she actually hit the high note in the one song but if she did…wow again!

The rest of my thoughts about the musical can be found here: https://lisahoweler.com/2025/07/11/summer-of-angela-the-pirates-of-penzance-1983/

The Long Hot Summer (1958)

This movie was on my radar originally because I was watching Paul Newman movies, but I watched it again when I did my Summer of Angela Lansbury movie feature last summer.

The Long Hot Summer is not an Angela Lansbury-focused movie, but she is in it and fills the screen with her personality when she is on it. The main stars are, of course, Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward, but Angela provides some comic relief as Orson Welles’ mistress, Minnie Littlejohn.

Here is a quick description of the movie from online:

Handsome vagabond Ben Quick (Paul Newman) returns to the Mississippi town his late father called home, but rumors of his dad’s pyromaniac tendencies follow him as soon as he sets foot there. The proud young man’s determination eventually wins over civic leader Will Varner (Orson Welles), who decides Ben might be just the man for his daughter, Clara (Joanne Woodward) — much to the displeasure of Will’s gutless son (Anthony Franciosa) and Clara’s society boyfriend (Richard Anderson).

When we first meet Angela, she comes running out of the Littlejohn Boarding House and Hotel as soon as he pulls up, wearing a tight and tiny white dress, and throws her arms around him. Her Southern accent is so jarring being familiar with her original accent and the American one she ended up developing as the years went on.

He laughs and declares she seems to be getting fatter and blonder on him.

Oh yeah…Didn’t I mention what a charmer he is?

Angela’s plays a playful flirt in this film, not a dark femme fatale like A Life At Stake and she credited the director, Martin Ritt, for bringing that playfulness out in her.

“Martin Ritt had a wonderful enthusiasm and earthy sexy quality himself,” she said. “He loved the idea of the dirtiness of the carryings on, and he certainly brought every bit of kind of naughty sexuality out of me in that role.”

As for Orson Welles, Angela agreed with others who said he was used to getting his own way because he normally had control of his own projects. This project wasn’t his though.

“He was always nudging and pushing for things and wanted to change lines,” said Angela. “But had to be carefully handled so that he didn’t always get his way because his way wasn’t necessarily the best way for everybody else in the scene.”

You can read more about the movie and Angela in it here: https://lisahoweler.com/2025/08/22/summer-of-angela-the-long-hot-summer/

I just wanted to leave you with this wonderful acceptance speech I saw on YouTube, when Angela was awarded an Olivier Award for her work in theater, which is where she started. This is just such a sweet speech and it made me weepy to see everyone cheer her on.

Have you seen any of these movies? If so, which one and what did you think of it?

Spring of Bette Davis: Dangerous (1935) (with spoilers)

On May 22, 2026May 21, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions, Spring of Bette8 Comments

This Spring, I am watching Bette Davis films.

This week I watched Dangerous (1935) and I will be honest before we get too far — I didn’t like it very much. I feel weird writing that because Bette won an Oscar for this movie and it is regarded as one of her breakout roles besides Human Bondage (1934). I think what I didn’t like about this film was the story. It didn’t seem super well written to me.

There are many film buffs who feel similar, according to what I read online.

Bette seemed a bit too over-the-top for me at times, but then she was playing a woman who wasn’t really mentally stable, especially toward the end of the movie.

The movie is about a former theater star who loses her career due to her alcoholism, but is rehabilitated by an architect/theater buff who falls for her.

I partially didn’t like the movie because, to me, it did what too many movies of the 30s through 50s did and made the woman out to be evil and the man innocent, even if he did the same thing as the woman.

How many movies of that period have you watched where everyone warned people of a man who was a womanizer instead of warning a man about the “floozy woman”?

I’ve watched a fair amount and it gets a bit old.

Bette’s character is a mess, and she does bring ruin to all men she’s around and encounters, yes. She’s also ruined her own acting career with her alcoholism.

You can’t help hoping throughout the movie that she’ll turn her life around, and at least once, it looks like she might.

I won’t give the end of the movie away, in case you ever want to try it, but I will say, don’t hold out too much hope. The ending is complex. Did she turn her life around, didn’t she? I’m not sure what to think, but I believe there was some character development.

The beginning starts with our male main character, Don Bellows (Franchot Tone), who is an architect, hearing about what a trainwreck Bette Davis’s character (Joyce Heath) is, but having fond memories of seeing her on the stage.

Don is engaged to Gail Armitage when he sees Joyce, drunk in a bar, later in the movie (what a coinky-dink, eh?). He feels bad for her and wants to rescue her, so he offers to let her stay at his house in the country (White Knight Syndrome anyone?).

The big issue is that Joyce, and many others, believe that she is bad luck for any man who comes around her.

This proves to be true for poor Don, who falls for Joyce and works to rehabilitate her, even though she acts like a spoiled brat who hates the world. Eventually Joyce starts to act better, like a stray cat that finally lets its rescuer give it a pet. Don breaks his engagement with Gail and puts up his fortune to back Joyce in a Broadway show because no one else will hire her unless he offers money.

He wants to marry Joyce, but she refuses him.

That’s when we learn that dear Joyce is still married to a man who was loyal to her but who she financially ruined. She asks him for a divorce and . .. Well, you will have to watch and see what happens.

Bette almost didn’t make this movie, which seems to be a theme with her actually. I’ve read a couple times that she had to be talked into starring in certain films. Those films were later a success.

I’ve also read a couple of times now how she started affairs with her leading men. This one was no different, other than it might be what kicked off her years-long rivalry and bitter feelings toward Joan Crawford, or Joan’s feelings toward her.

Joan and Franchot (what a name) were engaged when Bette started an affair with him, although she claimed it was an unrequited crush. Years later, producer Harry Joe Brown said it was anything but that when he found the two “in a compromising position.”

Reports say that Crawford knew all about it but didn’t break the engagement. Instead, she simply increased her visits to the set to make Davis jealous. She eventually did marry Tone and, like most of her marriages, it lasted about four years.

Dangerous was originally titled Hard Luck Woman.

In the movie, Bette plays a wide range of personalities, from a drunk woman to a woman who hopes for a better future with a man she loves.

I wasn’t the only one who wasn’t thrilled with the movie overall. Critics didn’t like the story, but they did like Bette’s performance.

One critic is said by TCM.com to have given her one of the most famous reviews of her career:

E. Arnot Robertson in Picture Post wrote: “I think Bette Davis would probably have been burned as a witch if she had lived two or three hundred years ago. She gives the curious feeling of being charged with power which can find no ordinary outlet.”

So, while I didn’t like the storyline of the film as much as some, I did like Bette’s performance.

Up next, I am watching The Letter.

My watch list for this feature:

Jezebel https://lisahoweler.com/2026/05/06/spring-of-bette-davis-jezebel-1938/

Dangerous

The Letter (May 26)

Of Human Bondage (May 28)

Now, Voyager (June 2)

The Petrified Forrest (June 11)

I am tacking another movie on to this list — The Petrified Forrest with her and Leslie Howard and Humphrey Bogart. My husband watched this one years ago and says it is very good so I will use it to round out my Spring of Bette Davis, which will stretch a little bit into the summer.

Sources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/87882/dangerous

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026261/

http://thefilmexperience.net/blog/2014/2/25/seasons-of-bette-dangerous-1935.html

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026261/

https://www.tcm.com/articles/87882/dangerous

Spring of Bette (Davis): Jezebel (1938). Otherwise known as the movie that made me say, “Well, that escalated fast.”

On May 6, 2026May 18, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions, Spring of Bette11 Comments

This spring, I have been watching Bette Davis movies, and this past weekend, I watched Jezebel from 1938.

Wow. What a wild ride.

The tagline for this one could be — well, that escalated fast.

Especially as the movie gets toward the end.

It just races forward like a freight train out of control, but in a good way.

Bette stars in this one with a very serious Henry Fonda (I think he’s serious in every movie he is in).

George Brent, who was also in Dark Victory with her, is in this one too.

*George Brent and Bette Davis.*
*This is not my photo. Copyright Warner Bros.*

Our story takes place outside of New Orleans in 1852.

Bette portrays a woman named Julie who comes from a wealthy family and is engaged to a banker named Preston. Preston is often busy, and this irks Julie, who is very headstrong and self-centered.

When she is getting fitted for a long white ballgown she is supposed to wear to a special ball, she sees a red dress and decides she’s going to stand out and wear that one.

Everyone in the shop and in her family is horrified.

You just don’t wear red in “polite Southern society” at this or any ball.

Forget that, Julie says, even when Preston sees the dress and tells her there is no way she is wearing it. She is wearing it, she tells him, and that is that. The dress is gorgeous, even in black and white, by the way. I wanted to see it color and looked online, but couldn’t actually find an official photo of it anywhere. There are some colorizations of it, but those were done by others, that I can see.

A Photoshopped-colorized image of Julie’s forbidden red dress. Not my photo.

All of Bette’s clothes in this movie are stunning.

Back to the movie, though….Preston is furious but takes her to the ball anyhow. At the ball, people part like the Red Sea, not because they are impressed. They are scandalized by the dress and act like Julie is a — well, you know.

Preston returns Julie and her family home later that evening and says to Julie’s mother he wishes her a goodnight. To Julie, he says, “Goodbye, Julie.”

This is after they had known each other as children and always expected to marry. Oof!

Julie doesn’t believe it’s really happening, but things get real when Preston moves to the North to run a bank and leaves her behind.

I won’t ruin the rest of it for you. I will tell you that there is a reason the movie is called Jezebel and it is because Julie is called it by someone she knows.

Promotional image for Jezebel from Warner Bros.

For those who are not familiar with the name Jezebel, it refers to the wife of King Ahab of Israel, who was not a very nice woman at all. She would be called “immoral” by many.

I don’t tell you some of the details of the movie or the ending, but I will caution you that you need to fasten your seatbelt after this point in the movie if you do decide to watch it. There is going to be betrayal, talk of slavery failing the south on an economic level, slaves singing as part of the nightly entertainment, a yellow fever breakout, a dual, and so much more.

Your head is going to start spinning before it is all said and done.

*Bette in her white dress. (Not my photo.)*

Overall, I enjoyed the rush of this movie. I couldn’t look away. It was a bit like Gone with the Wind but shorter. I was somewhat horrified at how women were expected to act and dress a certain way during that time, but, of course, knowing the history, I know it was true.

While I am on the subject of Gone with the Wind, Bette Davis tried out for the role of Scarlet, but didn’t get it.

That worked out well for her in the end. This movie was her first big-budget film, and she won an Oscar for it in 1939. Bette’s co-star, Fay Bainter, who played her aunt Belle, also won an Oscar for best supporting actress.

Vivien Leigh won hers in 1940 for playing Scarlet O’Hara in Gone With The Wind.

Henry Fonda was very good as the brooding Preston, who was also facing his changing ideas of what the South really was.

I haven’t seen him in a ton of movies, but the ones I have seen him in, he was a lot older, so it was fun to see him so young.

Henry Fonda and Bette Davis. (Copyright TCM)

The acting from all of the cast was really very strong, and pulled me right into the time period. The black actors were great but I have a bad feeling they didn’t get the credit they should have at the time.

Warner Bros. had started planning Jezebel as a way for Davis to break out in a big movie as far back as 1935. They were going to buy playwright Owen Davis Sr.’s failed play back then, but passed on it.

But then the book Gone With The Wind took off.

Warner Bros didn’t get the rights to that, so they went back to get the rights to Jezebel.

They hired one of Hollywood’s top directors of that time, William Wyler.

Bette and William started an affair and when he later married another actress, Bette was said to be devastated and in later years called him the love of her life. They paired up again in a professional capacity in The Letter (1940) and The Little Foxes (1941).

So far, I would say this one, next to It’s Love I’m After, is my favorite movie of Bette’s I’ve watched so far.

Up next, I am watching Dangerous.

My watch list for this feature:

Jezebel

Dangerous (May 9)

The Letter (May 14)

Of Human Bondage (May 21)

Now, Voyager (May 28)

Sources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/136752/the-essentials-jezebel

Classic Movie Impressions. Spring of Bette: Dark Victory or the movie I couldn’t finish because it hit too close to home

On May 1, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn everyday musings12 Comments

Full disclaimer this week: the subject matter of this movie made it too difficult for me to watch all the way through, so I’m telling you what the movie is about, but I skimmed a lot of this movie.

I’ve been watching Bette Davis movies for spring and this week the one I chose was Dark Victory, released in 1939.

Sadly, for personal reasons, I could not make it all the way through this one. I did read what it was about before watching it, and I thought I could handle it, but I could not.

Bette acted well in this one — though I do think she is a tad bit overacting at times in many of her films. That is her style, so it’s okay, but her delivery is often more abrasive than I think it needs to be.

In this film, she had reason to be abrasive.

It is not a spoiler to say that in this movie, Bette’s character is diagnosed with a brain tumor.

It’s in the description of the movie online, such as Google:

“Socialite Judith Traherne (Bette Davis) lives a lavish but emotionally empty life. Riding horses is one of her few joys, and her stable master (Humphrey Bogart) is secretly in love with her. Told she has a brain tumor by her doctor, Frederick Steele (George Brent), Judith becomes distraught. After she decides to have surgery to remove the tumor, Judith realizes she is in love with Dr. Steele, but more troubling medical news may sabotage her new relationship, and her second chance at life.”

This is not a totally accurate description, however. Let me preface all this by saying the next bit will be a spoiler of sorts so if you haven’t seen the movie and want to, you will want to skip this.

Are you ready?

I’m going to tell you something about the movie that the description didn’t. Ready?

You sure?

Okay….

Here goes….

Judith is told by her doctor that she is fine when in reality she has a cancerous brain tumor that will take her life in about 10 months. Dr. Steele wants her to live her life fully, believing she is fine because, I guess, he is in love with her love of life (even though a lot of it was drinking and sleeping around) and with her and doesn’t want to see the light go out of her when she finds out she is dying. He tells her sister she is dying because he feels guilty for lying and then he makes her also lie about it so Judith will have a good life until the end.

I think it is horrible and cruel, honestly, but at the same time, I understand Dr. Steele’s reasoning.

This movie is very melodramatic with a lot of tearjerker moments that I struggled with because when I worked for a newspaper, I had to write several stories about fundraisers for a little boy who was born with a brain tumor.

He was an amazing little boy, wise beyond his years. He died when he was seven years old, and not long after that his mother was diagnosed with the same type of brain tumor and died a few years later. She’d had another son, married another man (the first son’s father was a total dirt bag who just recently was charged with some inappropriate behavior as a judge and I am so happy about that), and was just starting to have her happy ending when she was diagnosed. I wrote a lot of stories about fundraisers for her, after I interviewed her about the death of her son. He had become somewhat of a community celebrity because of all his issues and the fundraisers held for him.

His name was Jordan. Her name was Jodi. They had the same brain tumor that this character has.

This sounds very selfish after all they went through, but I think I still have some PTSD after getting to know them, writing stories about them, and then having them both die. They deserved so much more.

Even writing all this out makes me sick to my stomach and has me crying so that’s the reason I couldn’t stomach this movie beyond skimming through it.

Back to the movie before I make my keyboard a safety hazard from all the wetness.

According to TCM, Bette and her co-star, George Brent, who plays Dr. Steele, were in 11 films together between 1932 and 1942.

They were never romantically linked off screen until after this film. Brent was divorcing his wife and Bette’s first husband was divorcing her and her affairs with Howard Hughes and director William Wyler were ending. The pair remained together for about a year and later in life Bette said of him, “Of the men I didn’t marry, the dearest was George Brent.”

The role was already intensely emotional and with Davis at her emotional breaking point, her performance ended up being one praised by critics when the film was released and for years to come.

Bette was the one who pushed for the rights for the play to be purchased but when they were, she said she didn’t feel she could pull off the role.

Margarita Landazuri writes for TCM that after only a few days of shooting, “Bette begged to be released from the film, claiming she was sick. Producer Hal Wallis replied, ‘Bette, I’ve seen the rushes – stay sick!’”

This movie is called a “three-hanky hit” because of how emotional it was. Viewers knew they were being emotionally manipulated by it but it was so well made, they didn’t mind.

It is a well-made film, Bette carries herself through the role beautifully, and it was fun seeing Humphrey Bogart in a side-role as her a man who has unrequited love for Judith.

Maybe it is because the movie was made so well that it made it impossible for me to watch it all the way through.

If you do decide to watch it, bring your tissues and muster through better than I did.

I should also mention that our former president Ronald Reagan was in this one and he was a roaring drunk, loser. Ha! He didn’t play it very convicingly so I don’t think that was his normal state, even as a young guy, but maybe I’m wrong?

Next up I’ll be watching Jezebel from 1938.

Here is a description of that movie in case you are interested: “In one of her most renowned roles, Bette Davis portrays Julie Marsden, a spoiled Southern belle who risks losing her suitor with her impetuous behavior. Engaged to successful banker Preston Dillard (Henry Fonda), Julie pushes him away with her arrogant and contrary ways, leading to a scandalous scene at a major social event and his subsequent departure. When Preston eventually returns and Julie attempts to win him back, she discovers that it may be too late.”

My watch list for this feature:

It’s Love I’m After (April 15)

The Working Man (April 21)

Another Man’s Poison (April 27)

Dark Victory (April 30)

Jezebel (May 1)

Dangerous (May 7)

The Letter (May 12)

Of Human Bondage (May 21)

Now, Voyager (May 28)

Additional sources/resources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/29905/dark-victory

https://theblondeatthefilm.com/2015/02/02/dark-victory-1939/

Spring of Bette (Davis): Another Man’s Poison

On April 27, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions12 Comments

Another Man’s Poison was my second Bette Davis movie, and I watched it on a whim sometime back in January. All About Eve was my first Bette Davis movie, in case you are curious.

This movie is dark from the start. We have Bette Davis as Janet Frobisher, and she’s already committed a crime that she would like to keep quiet.

A celebrated mystery writer, Janet married a criminal who was also abusive. We never get to see her husband because at the start of the movie, he’s already dead and she’s killed him. Not a spoiler. It’s the movie set up and will set up the direction of the rest of the movie.

She’s already called Larry, the fiancé of her secretary, who she, incidentally, is having an affair with, and asked him to come to her house that weekend. She’s walked to a phone box very far from her house to make the call and her nose neighbor, Dr. Henderson, the local vet, comments to her about how odd it is she is in town when she owns a mansion with phones in every room.

Janet essentially tells him to get lost and goes back home.

She has plans to dump her husband’s body in the pond on their property, but a man, George Bates (played by her real-life husband Gary Merrill), breaks into her house looking for her husband, saying he’s a robber and a murderer he and her husband were supposed to meet there after the robbery to escape together.

After a bunch of back and forth, Janet confesses she killed her husband but before she can kick Bates out the door, Dr. Henderson (Emlyn Williams) shows up and not wanting him to know she killed her husband, who Henderson has never met, she agrees to let Bates pretend he is her husband.

What results is another hour or so of panic, blackmail, and manipulation that will make your head spin. And then ending…well I can’t talk about it but oof! All I’ll say is karma is a word I do not write out or usually use so I’ll just say — a jerk!

While researching this film I was surprised to find out that it was co-produced by one of my favorite actors — Douglas Fairbanks Jr. I watched a ton of his movies last winter, which you can find here (scroll down the page).

Bette jumped at the opportunity to film this British thriller in the UK because there was a part for her new husband, free passage on the Queen Elizabeth cruise liner, and she could bring her children. It was essentially a free honeymoon.

There was a problem with the script but, according to TCM, Bette ignored this because she could choose her director (American Irving Rapper who directed one of her biggest hits, Now, Voyager in 1942). She liked him because “she could dominate him” the TCM article says.

“I’ve always wanted to play in a suspense picture as they’re made in England, with that quiet effectiveness which the British singularly seem to possess,” Bette told the British reporter.

Trouble always seemed to follow Bette and this time was no different. As soon as she arrived in England she threw a lavish party for the British press who rewarded her with tabloid articles about her mink coats, her excess and her husband, “Mr. Davis.”

This movie was not really well-received, with critics rolling their eyes at what they called “the absurdities of the script.”

They were impressed with how Bette pulled off the role even with the issues, though.

“No one has ever accused Bette Davis of failing to rise to a good script; what this film shows is how far she can go to meet a bad one,” critic Frank Hauser wrote in New Statesman and Nation.

The movie wasn’t a success at the time for the couple but visiting England was.

Actor Emlyn Williams bringing the schoolteacher who had been the inspiration for Miss Moffat in The Corn Is Green onto the set of Another Man’s Poison, and introducing her to Davis was an absolute thrill for Davis who starred in The Corn is Green in 1945.

The marriage went the way of the movie, I should add, ending only a year later, which was probably good because it was said to be a rocky and abusive one.

Have you seen this one?

Up next for my Spring of Bette feature is: Dark Victory.

My watch list for this feature:

It’s Love I’m After (April 15)

The Working Man (April 21)

Another Man’s Poison (April 27)

Dark Victory (April 30)

Jezebel (May 1)

Dangerous (May 7)

The Letter (May 12)

Of Human Bondage (May 21)

Now, Voyager (May 28)

Additional sources/resources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/27959/another-mans-poison

Classic Movie Impressions: Shadow of the Thin Man (1941)

On April 22, 2026April 21, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions2 Comments

I have been watching and writing about The Thin Man movies, and up this time is Shadow of the Thin Man, which is the fourth movie in a six-movie series.

You can find my impressions/reviews/recaps/whatever you want to call it here.

If you have read my other posts or are familiar with these movies, then you know that the main characters are Nick and Nora Charles.

Nick is a private investigator, but is mainly helping to manage all of Nora’s money since she is an heiress.

Nora, however, would like Nick to do a little more and keep himself busy instead of drinking alcohol and gambling.

Myrna Loy made a comment in her autobiography that movies four through six weren’t as good as the first three because the original writers, Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, had decided they didn’t want to be a part of the franchise any longer. I respectfully disagree with her, at least for Shadow of the Thin Man. The mystery is convoluted, as always, (and I am really not sure about the guilty party making sense) but I felt the banter between Nick and Nora was as well-written as the previous movies. This one was a lot better than Another Thin Man, which was confusing and all over the place to me, and written by the married writers.

Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett tried to tank the series after the second movie by adding a baby because they really didn’t want to write a third. They clearly failed at sinking the series. By this movie, Goodrich and Hackett had literally had it.

“They press you awfully hard there…” Goodrich said. “When they started talking about another Thin Man, we started throwing up and crying into our typewriters. We had the nervous breakdown together, [so] we said, ‘let’s get out of here [and] we quit.’”

Novelist Dashiell Hammett, the original creator of the characters, also bowed out of the movies and refused to be part of it.

In this edition, we are introduced to Nick Jr., who is now around 5-years-old. He adds even more chaos and comedy to the mix, especially with his interactions with Nick Sr.

In one scene, he tells his dad he needs to drink more milk instead of alcohol at dinner. This makes Nick Sr. choke down half a glass of milk with some hilarious expressions, before the doorbell rings and he is let off the hook.

It is in this movie that I have to admit I do feel like Nick’s drinking is less funny and more sad. I get that Nick drinking too much is a running joke throughout the movie series, but he’s a dad now and showing his kid that he drinks no matter the mood he is in. There is always an excuse to drink with Nick Charles Sr.

But let’s not get too logical or realistic here. This is a comedy-mystery and we are meant to have some fun watching it, which I did.

In the beginning of the film, we see Nick and Nick Jr. at the park and they are supposed to be reading a child’s book, but Nick Sr. is trying to read the horses who are going to be at the races later in the day. He’s added gambling to his irresponsible repertoire I guess.

Soon Nick is on his way to the track, but not before he’s pulled over for speeding, which is quickly forgiven when the officer recognizes Nick name. Not only does the office not give Nick a ticket, but he’s given a police escort to the track. Things seem to be out of hand, though, when tons of police cars surround the car and escort Nick and Nora into the track. The couple is confused when officers gather around the car and start fawning over him and telling him how impressed they were with the last case he solved.

It turns out that they aren’t actually there for Nick, though. There’s been a murder at the track. Nick doesn’t care, though, and seems determined not to get involved.

He doesn’t want to get involved even when Major Jason I. Sculley, the special deputy for the state legislature, and investigative reporter Paul Clarke visit and ask for his help in the case.

Of course, he eventually does get involved and the mystery picks up. I enjoyed the little interludes in this one, more than the mystery. There are some hilarious scenes with Nora and Nick at a wrestling match where Nora is where a hat that men keep commenting on because they think it is silly.

Then there is the relatable scene where Nick is on a merry-go-round with Nick Jr., trying to grab a ring but getting motion sick and dizzy in the process.

Another Thin Man (1939) was filmed shortly after Powell’s finance Jean Harlow died suddenly. This movie also brought heartache for cast members, especially Powell who lost his ex-wife Carole Lombard in a plane crash in and then his first wife and mother of his only son, Eileen Wilson also died. Myrna Loy went through a divorce and then a quick marriage, which was a strike at her character’s “good girl image.”

But then the real blow to the entire cast and country was when Pearl Harbor was attacked two weeks after the movie released.

In 1943 the franchise also lost its director, W.S. Vandyke, after he passed away.

Loy recalled feeling the void, both of a director and friend, saying that “[Van Dyke] seems to be neglected now. He was one of Hollywood’s best, most versatile directors.

Donna Reed appeared in this film in only her second major screen role.

The firth movie in the series, The Thin Man Goes Home, didn’t come out until 1944, partially due to the war and VanDyke’s death.

Did you make it this far in the series?

You can catch my other movie recaps here:

The Thin Man

After The Thin Man

Another Thin Man

Sources or Additional Resources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/81421/shadow-of-the-thin-man

Spring of Bette Davis: The Working Man (1933)

On April 21, 2026 By Lisa R. HowelerIn classic movie impressions, Movie Impresssions10 Comments

I’m watching Bette Davis movies this spring, but have chosen some of the less popular ones for something different.

This next movie, A Working Man, came on after It’s Love I’m After and intrigued me in the first several minutes so I decided to stick with it. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would. It was a cute movie and a very early one for Bette. So early, she still had platinum blonde hair and was 25-years old.

I have a temporarily lost remote to thank for finding this one.

This pre-Hayes Code 1933 movie is about John Reeves (George Arliss), the president of the Reeves Shoe Company, who is determined to beat his competitor, Hartland Shoes.

He’s so determined to beat the competition that he ignores a request by a friend to go fishing in Maine.

His nephew Benjamin Burnett is ready for Reeves to retire so he can take over the business already.

When Tom Hartland, CEO of the Hartland Shoe Company, dies, John Reeves is saddened, even though he was his main competitor.

Benjamin begins to hint that John is senile and to teach him a lesson, John heads off for that fishing in Maine, leaving him to run the business for a while and see what it is like.

Ironically, though, a yacht stops running near John’s fishing pier and two young people swim up to ask for booze while they wait. John, who has always been a hard worker, is disgusted by their laziness. One of those young people is Bette Davis as Jenny Hartland.

The other is her brother Tommy Hartland played by Theodore Newton.

As they begin to chat, John learns they are the spoiled children of the recently deceased Tom Hartland. John decides to call himself John Walton and befriends them so he can spy on their company but as the spying begins, John starts to like the two kids and decides he wants to help them better themselves. He also discovers that the shoe making plant for their late father’s business is being mismanaged.

This launches him into a journey to save the business he’s been trying to destroy for years while also trying to keep his own business going and his identity hidden.

Bette is so young in this one, as I mentioned above.

The screenplay for the movie was based on a story The Adopted Father by Edgar Franklin and written by Charles Kenyon and Maude T. Howell.

Arliss was a well-known silent movie star before going into talking films and reprised his role in this movie from his 1924 silent movie Twenty Dollars a Week, which was based on the same story. Hollywood does like to rehash an old story because the 1936 20th Century Fox film Everybody’s Old Man was based on the same source.

The movie was Arliss and Bette’s second time appearing together in a movie. They were in The Man Who Played God the year before.

But their relationship goes deeper than just being in a previous movie together, according to TCM.com.

“[The Working Man] was the second and last film Davis made with Arliss, whom she always considered one of her mentors and the person who was responsible for saving her nascent film career,” an article on the site states. “She first met Arliss in the late 1920s, when he was a guest lecturer at the drama school she attended in New York. He counseled her not to adopt the exaggerated “cultured” English diction that many actors were then using. Instead, he suggested that she speak standard American English, but make an effort to get rid of her New England accent. Davis followed his advice. In late 1930, Davis was signed to a contract by Universal and went to Hollywood, but she was cast in pallid secondary roles and made little impression. Nine months later, Universal dropped her. According to Davis, she and her mother were packing up to return to New York, when she received a phone call summoning her to a meeting with Arliss, then one of Warners’ top stars. After meeting with Arliss, she was cast in The Man Who Played God, and signed to a Warner Bros. contract.”

We talk about the oversaturation of the entertainment market these days, but back then, movies were made fast and furious. Bette made, or at least released, seven movies in 1933.

The Working Man was her 15^th movie, and she only started working in movies two years before. The New York Times gave Bette a good review saying, “Bette Davis, whose diction is music to the ears, does good work in the role of Jenny.” Bette had good memories of working with Arliss.

“Whatever was happening on his set, at four p.m. sharp, everything stopped for a half hour while we had tea,” she said. “I think he had it in his contract. Mr. Arliss helped pour, and everyone, to the lowliest grip, participated. I especially enjoyed knowing instinctively that Mr. Jack L. Warner was sitting in his office having a fit during this expensive homage to a civilized way of life.”

Even after Arliss went back to England in 1935, Bette continued to look at him as her mentor.

Margarita Landazuri wrote in her article on TCM that when Bette was in a contract dispute with Warner, Arliss told her to give in and not to try to sue Jack Warner again. She’d already lost her first attempt.

“Bette, you must go home and do anything they ask for one year,” he told her. “You must accept the fact that you have lost. It’s difficult to handle defeat, but you can take it.” Realizing that her career would be over if she continued to fight, Davis followed his advice. She swallowed her pride and returned to Warner Bros., where she soon became the studio’s top female star. “He certainly was my first professional father,” Davis said of Arliss, and the sentiment was reciprocated. In her home, she kept a framed photograph of Arliss. The inscription read, “with adopted fatherly affection.”