Book recommendation: Miss Buncle’s Book by D.E. Stevenson

It was either someone on Instagram or a YouTube channel which talks about books that told me about D.E. Stevenson and especially Miss Buncle, and I am forever grateful for whomever that was.

I wish I could remember the first one who mentioned it, but I do remember Jenn’s Reading Room talking about the first book in the series, and then I saw at least one other person talking about it.

I am going to credit Jen’s Reading Room with giving me the idea to find a copy of the book and read it, though.

It was almost impossible to find a used copy of this book, which was originally published in 1936, and, at first, I couldn’t find it anywhere in a digital format to borrow it. I do not usually buy books I haven’t read yet, just to be sure I do like it before I put it on my shelf, but when I saw this one was on sale in paperback, I ordered it.

I am not sorry I did that.

Miss Buncle’s Book is about a woman named Barbara Buncle who lives in a small English village and writes a fictionalized version of the people and their lives in a book called Disturber of the Peace. She uses the real-life situations of people she knows because she says she has no imagination to think up stories on her own.

She shops publishers for the book, hoping to make some extra money in hard times and is shocked and unprepared when the book is not only published but becomes a quick bestseller.

When people in her little village get ahold of the book, word quickly begins to spread that many of the characters resemble people in the village, even though the names have been changed.

The humor in this book is top-notch, and the characters are super lovable, even the characters we’re not supposed to like.

The book is also so creatively done because it’s almost as if D.E. Stevenson is writing about herself while writing about Miss Buncle. She writes about the writing process and how people receive her books and how Miss Buncle feels about people reading here book. At one point Miss Buncle is writing a book about writing a book, like D.E. Stevenson was. So we had Stevenson writing a book about Miss Buncle writing a book about her character Elizabeth Wade writing a book. Yes, it’s just as crazy as it sounds, but so well done.

One thing I love about the book is how Stevenson writes her as someone who is pretty much over having to act a certain way and be “proper.”

“’How nice for you — and for her of course,’ exclaimed Barbara. She had lived for so long among these people and had suffered so many afternoon teas that she was able to say the expected thing without thinking about it at all. You simply put a penny in the machine, and the expected thing came out at once, all done up and a neat little packet, and suitably labeled. The machine worked without any effort on Barbara‘s part. It even worked when the real Barbara was absent, and only the shell, dressed in its shabby garments, remained sitting upright upon chair. The real Barbara often flew away like that, and took refuge from the darkness and boredom of Silverstream in the scintillating atmosphere of Copperfield.

I also love how Stevenson writes about authors and how they work.

“Dorcas went away. She was beginning to get used to living in the house with an author. It was not comfortable, she found, and it was distinctly trying to the temper. Dorcas often thought with regret of the good old days when the dividends had come in punctually, and Miss Barbara had been an ordinary, human being; taking her meals at regular hours, going up to bed as the clock struck 11, and coming down for breakfast in the morning when the clock struck nine.

Authors! said Dorcas to herself with scornful, emphasis. authors, indeed! Well, I’ll never read a book again, but what I think of the people who has had to put up with the author. I know that.  Preparing meals and beating the gong and going back half an hour later to find nobody’s ever been near them and the mutton fat frozen salad in the dish and the soup stone cold and then ringing bells all hours for coffee and  “make it strong!” Dorcas make it strong!” and then writing half the night and lying in bed half the day with people towing up to their bedrooms with trays.  Authors, poof!”

Miss Buncle having to deal with reviews that can be bad, while also helping her book sales, is also hilarious. At one point, Mr. Abbott tells her that her reviews are being very helpful to the sale of the book.

“Helpful!” she says. “Some of them said I was immoral and perverted!”

Her publisher is delighted.

“I know it was simply marvelous”, replied Mr. Abbott holding out his cigarette and watching the smoke curl upward with appreciation. “It really was marvelous. In my wildest and most optimistic moments I scarcely dared to hope that they would misread you to that extent.”

The publisher really doesn’t care if people misunderstand Barbara’s book as long as he’s making the sales, of course. But Mr. Abbott becomes an important part of Barbara’s life, and you’ll have to read the book to find out why.

After I finished this book I felt a sense of sadness and loss because I enjoyed opening it each day for a couple of weeks.

I would definitely recommend this book if you are looking for something light, fun, and don’t mind a little bit of the “old style” of writing from the 1930s.

Book review/recommendation: The Ivory Dagger by Patricia Wentworth

The Ivory Dagger was my first Patricia Wentworth book so it was also my first Miss Silver Mystery as well.

This was number 18 in the series and it didn’t matter that I had not read the previous 17 books. I was able to catch on with the characters and their backgrounds very quickly. Wentworth was a British Mystery writer who published books between the 1920s and the 1960s. The Ivory Dagger was written in 1953.

 I liked Maud Silver, the elderly woman called in to help solve the crime, immediately. I also liked Detective Inspector Frank Abbott immediately.

It was made clear, without too much supposition on past cases, that these two had worked together before and had a very teasing and affectionate relationship because of that.

I absolutely loved their interactions.

Let’s go back and grab a description of the book from online, though:

Bill Waring, collecting his wits in hospital after a train crash, receives only one letter from Lila Dryden, his fiancée. When he discovers Lady Dryden, Lila’s guardian, has pressured her into an engagement with Herbert Whitall, he is furious.
Herbert Whitall is aggressive, with a cold-hearted possessiveness that expands past the bounds of his ivory collection he can’t bear to lose. His employees hate him, Lila is terrified of him and it appears he has a hold on Lady Dryden.
When a dagger in Whitall’s collection becomes the instrument of his own death there are many suspects. Maud Silver must see that justice is done, not merely to punish the guilty, but to protect the innocent.

One thing left out of this particular description, but is in others, is that Lila becomes the prime suspect because she is found standing over his body, holding an ivory dagger that belonged to him.

She has a history of sleep walking, though, and this seems to be another one of those incidents. Could she have killed Herbert in her sleep? Even she is worried about that.

I won’t lie – I wasn’t a big fan of Lila through parts of this book. She was pretty weak and cruel to Bill and others at times, but, then, she was also very young and inexperienced at life.

It’s Lady Dryden who calls in Miss Silver because she has heard about the previous cases Miss Silver has solved.

Miss Silver doesn’t know when she comes to the mansion, that Frank Abbott has been assigned the case but she is pleasantly surprised. Frank is pleasantly surprised with her appearance as well.

“Frank Abbott took the hand and reciprocated the smile. Adrian Gray having mentioned that there was a Miss Silver staying in the house, he was by no means unprepared for the appearance of the lady who he had been known in moments of expansion to address as Revered Preceptress. They were, all jesting apart, on a footing of deep attachment, and, upon Frank’s side, of a most unfeigned respect.”

Miss Silver knows that the focus is on Lila but there is a list of people who didn’t like Whitall, so she must look at them all. She doesn’t think Lila is guilty. Neither does Frank so they will need to join their efforts to find out who really is guilty.

Miss Silver reminds me of Agatha Christie’s Miss Marple and has similar hobbies and mannerisms. Miss Silver also has similar great comebacks or lines as Miss Marple.

They both appear to be innocent old ladies just sitting and knitting away while they are actually listening in to solve the crime. In this one, Miss Silver is knitting a vest for a great niece or relative, I can’t remember which. Wentworth likes to remind us she’s just simply knitting along with such lines as, “The crocket hook went in and out, making a delicate shell pattern about the neck of little Josephine’s vest.”

One difference between Miss Silver and Miss Marple is that Miss Silver is an actual private investigator and Miss Marple is simply a spinster living in a small town who becomes involved in solving crimes.

If you’re curious  which one came first, it was Miss Marple by a year. Her first story was published as a short story in 1927. The first Miss Silver book came out in 1928.

If you would like to know more about the similarities and differences, I recommend this great blog post from the blog Promoting Crime. https://promotingcrime.blogspot.com/2014/10/miss-marple-and-miss-silvera-comparison.html

What I like about Wentworth’s writing is that she is light on description of characters, scenery, and other aspects of the story, but still heavier than Christie. She provides more literary imagery to draw from to create an image in the readers mind of the main characters and the surroundings than Christie does. This doesn’t mean that one is better than the other. Christie was a brilliant stripped back storyteller and Wentworth is also a wonderful storyteller who simply adds a bit more personality and description to her characters.

Wentworth’s writing reminded me more of Margery Allingham, another Golden Age mystery writer, than Agatha’s. Both Wentworth and Allingham were great at creating engaging and well-written sentences or paragraphs that left you wanting to read it again, highlight it, or write it down.

“They sat facing one another. Feature and expression were hidden by the darkness, yet each knew the other so well that his darkness was only a black screen upon which memory could throw its pictures. Bill holding doggedly to what he had said and saying it all over again, as if battering repetition was an argument in itself. Ray on the defensive – quick thrust and parry to met his bludgeon blows, eyes wide and the colour in her cheeks like flame.”

Though this wasn’t the first book in the series, it was a good introduction for me and I am looking forward to reading more.


If you write book reviews or book-related blog posts, don’t forget that Erin, Cat, and I host the A Good Book and A Cup of Tea Monthly Bookish Blog Party. You can learn more about it here.

On Thursdays, I am part of the Weekend Traffic Jam Reboot blog link party. You can find the latest one in the sidebar to the right under recent posts.

Notice: This post may contain affiiate links. If you purchase the product from these links I will receive a small compensation at no extra charge to you.


Hello! Welcome to my blog. I am a blogger, homeschool mom, and I write cozy mysteries.

You can find my Gladwynn Grant Mystery series HERE.

You can also find me on Instagram and YouTube and Facebook.

If you would like to be the first to get news about my books or just have access to special posts for supporters, you can do so here for $2.99 a month https://lisahoweler.com/support-my-writing/

Book recommendation: The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie

You don’t have to guess who is going to die in this Agatha Christie book since the title is The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

But who killed Roger Ackroyd is going to get complicated and you’ll need to strap yourself in for the rollercoaster ride.

The book was originally presented as a serialization entitled Who Killed Ackroyd? From July to September of 1925 in the London Evening News.

The book is about a doctor, James Sheppard,  who lives in the small English village of King’s Abbot with his spinster sister Caroline and gets wrapped up in the mystery of the murder of well-known village resident Roger Ackroyd, which occurs within 24-hours after another village resident commits suicide.

From Goodreads: “Considered to be one of Agatha Christie’s greatest and also, most controversial mysteries. ‘The Murder Of Roger Ackroyd’ breaks the rules of traditional mystery.”

I didn’t realize this was a Hercule Poirot book before I started it. This is actually the third Poirot book, which I found interesting since in it he is talking about retirement. Dr. Sheppard narrates this book in first person, creating a unique and entertaining way to introduce Poirot.

This is my seventh Agatha Christie read this year as I work through the books on my own and through the 2026 Christie Reading Challenge.

Before I was done with this one, someone online (I can’t remember if it  was a comment on my post or someone else’s post, spilled the beans that the ending was shocking. They said there was a surprising twist so that had me trying to figure out the twist through most of the book, which means I figured out the killer but still had to be sure I was right and still wanted to know how Agatha lead the reader there.

I was right but I still enjoyed the book immensely. Agatha really was ahead of her time with her plot twists and stories overall. Never before, or maybe I should say, rarely before, had mystery writers taken readers down such psychological roads with endings that left the reader not just thinking about the mystery’s solution, but also about the nature of humans and why they do what they do.

I’m not going to say she was the first to do this (hello, Conan Doyle, Allingham, Sayers, etc.), of course, but she did pull off the twists in interesting ways. I would say that the ending of Crooked House was one of the darkest and uncomfortable twists in any era, let alone the Golden Age of Mystery era.

As in any Poirot book, there were hilarious or interesting quotes.

Among them was one that came from Poirot after he accidentally hits Dr. Sheppard with a marrow (squash):

“I demand of you a thousand pardons, monsieur. I am without defence. For some months now I cultivate the marrows. This morning suddenly I enrage myself with these marrows. I send them to promenade themselves — alas! Not only mentally but physically. I seize the biggest. I hurl him over the wall. Monsieur, I am ashamed, I prostrate myself.”

Dr. Sheppard doesn’t know who Poirot, who has moved in next to him and his sister, is at first. He thinks he might be a hairdresser.

“Clearly a retired hairdresser,” he thinks at one point. “Who knows the secrets of human nature better than a hairdresser?”

 Dr. Sheppard calls him “Porrott” and is bewildered by the clues the man is giving him. Poirot also has no idea Dr. Sheppard doesn’t know he’s a famous detective.

“Mr. Ackroyd knew me in London, when I was at work there,” Poirot tells him after the marrow hitting incident. “I have asked him to say nothing of my profession down here.’
Sheppard continues by saying, “I see,” and is amused at Poirot’s “patent snobbery.”

“But the little man went on with an almost grandiloquent smirk,” Christie writes.

“One refers to remain incognito. I am not anxious for notoriety.  I have not even troubled to correct the local version of my name.”

“Indeed,” I said, not knowing quiet what to say.

Another funny quote that I took as a bit of a self-deprecating jab at herself by Christie, since she once wrote romances too: “What made you notice Ralph Paton?  His good looks?”

“No, not that alone — though he is unusually good-looking for an Englishman — what your lady novelists would call a Greek God. No, there was something about that young man that I did  not understand.”

Up next in my Agatha Christie reading journey is a different book for Agatha — The Rose and the Yew Tree — a tragedy written by Agatha under the name Mary Westcott.

Have you read The Murder of Roger Ackroyd? What did you think?

Book recommendation: Amish Inn Mystery, Stolen Past by Tara Randel

I was looking for a simple cozy mystery with lovable characters and a straight mystery recently and that’s what I found in Stolen Past by Tara Randel.

The book is part of the Amish Inn Mysteries from the now defunct Annie’s Attic.

The books were written by a few different authors, but all feature the same characters: inn owner Liz Eckhardt and her friends Mary Ann and Sadie, mayor (love interest but subtle) Jackson Cross and lazy bulldog Beans.

This time around the town of Pleasant Creek is set to celebrate a special anniversary but someone in town is stirring up trouble by stealing historically-related items and threatening to make trouble if a play about the signing of the town charter isn’t presented the way we want it.

This series includes a very slow burn romance between Liz and the mayor with just a few mild hints made here and there but very secondary to the mystery itself.

Liz’s friends Sadie and Mary Ann are “older ladies” who often pop up in the mysteries and in this one Sadie plays a bigger role than usual as a former friend comes out as the front runner for being the possible town thief.

This one may not have you on the edge of your seat, but it will have you pondering who the guilty party is while enjoying reading about the connections between Liz and her friends.


If you write book reviews or book-related blog posts, don’t forget that Erin and I host the A Good Book and A Cup of Tea Monthly Bookish Blog Party. You can learn more about it here.

On Thursdays, I am part of the Weekend Traffic Jam Reboot blog link party. You can find the latest one in the sidebar to the right under recent posts.

Notice: This post may contain affiiate links. If you purchase the product from these links I will receive a small compensation at no extra charge to you.


Hello! Welcome to my blog. I am a blogger, homeschool mom, and I write cozy mysteries.

You can find my Gladwynn Grant Mystery series HERE.

You can also find me on Instagram and YouTube and Facebook.

If you would like to be the first to get news about my books or just have access to special posts for supporters, you can do so here for $2.99 a month https://lisahoweler.com/support-my-writing/

Book recommendations: The Labors of Hercules by Agatha Christie

I’ve been participating in the  Read Christie 2026 Challenge, and for May, I read The Labors of Hercules.

It is a collection of short stories featuring Christie’s Belgian detective, Hercule Poirot.

The stories all connect and follow the theme of Poirot sharing twelve cases to close his career as a private detective. Because he was named after Hercules (though his name does not have the “s”), he decides his final cases will be those that follow the Greek myth of the 12 Labors of Hercules.

I don’t really know a lot about Greek mythology, but I figured it out along the way.

Agatha wrote these as serialized stories in The Strand magazine from 1939 to 1940, with the last one being written for the collection in 1947.

I wasn’t too sure about this one when I started it, but the book, with each chapter focused on a short mystery, grew on me as I kept going. Some of the stories were more serious than the others.

I almost gave up after the second story, since the first couple were not written well to me, but I’m glad I didn’t give up because the stories got better – especially the final one where Poirot ran into a woman he used to have an attraction to – Countess Vera Rossakoff.

There was a lot of humor and just a good story in that one, which was entitled The Capture of Cerberus.

Here are a couple of quotes I enjoyed from that story:

“It is the misfortune of small precise men to hanker after large and flamboyant women. Poirot had never been able to rid himself of the fatal fascination the Countess held for him. Though I was something like twenty years since he had seen her last, the magic still held. Granted that her makeup now resembled a scene-painter’s sunset, with the woman under the makeup well hidden from sight, to Hercule Poirot she still represented the sumptuous and the alluring.”

When Poirot first sees her again after so many years, it is on an escalator and she shouts back at him to meet her in hell. He later learns from his secretary, Miss Lemon, that Hell is a nightclub, and he later learns the countess owns it.

At first, though, he is totally baffled.

“But what had she meant by it? Had she meant London’s Underground Railways? Or were her words to be taken in a religious sense? Surely, even if her own way of life made Hell the most plausible destination for her after this life, surely—surely her Russian Courtesy would not suggest that Hercule Poirot was necessarily bound for the same place?”

Then, when he finally does get to the club…

“The place was full and it had about it that unmistakable air of success which cannot be counterfeited. There were languid couples in full evening dress, Bohemians in corduroy trousers, stout gentlemen in business suits. The band, dressed as devils, dispensed hot music. No doubt about it, Hell had caught on.

“We have all kinds here,” said the Countess. “That is as it should be, is it not? The gates of Hell are open to all?”

“Except, possibly, to the poor?” Poirot suggested.

The Countess laughed. “Are we not told that it is difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven? Naturally, then, he should have priority in Hell.”

I was surprised by how much Agatha wrote about cocaine use and its destruction in these stories. Sometimes I am very naïve and forget that cocaine and drug abuse was a very real thing even back then.

If I didn’t think it would bore both you and me, I would go through each story and tell you why I did or didn’t like it, and share some quotes. Instead, I will simply reiterate that there were good stories and not as good stories, in my opinion, but that I would read them all because what one person doesn’t like, another person might like.

My mom and I share a Kindle/Goodreads account and I noticed when I finished it that she gave it a three star. I bumped it up to a four, but without that last story I might have given it a three too (or 3.5), even though the idea behind it was very ingenious.

Have you read this collection yet?

Up next for me for the Read Christie 2026 challenge is The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

A Good Book & A Cup of Tea (Monthly Bookish Blog Party) for June

Welcome to the A Good Book & A Cup of Tea (A Monthly Bookish Link Party)!! This link-up is for book and reading posts or anything related to books and reading (even movies based on books!).

Each link party will be open for a month.

My co-hosts for this event are Erin from Still Life, With Cracker Crumbs and Cat from Cat’s Wire.

Here are a few of my favorite shares from the May link party:

The Intrepid Reader wrote about some classics and got me thinking about classics I still need to read.

Grace Filled Moments shared a review of a devotional written by someone related to someone I know, so that was cool to see.

Homemade On a Weeknight shared what they read in April.

Thistles and Kiwis shared what was on her bookshelf in April.

I really enjoyed Cat chatting about Margaret Rutherford as Miss Marple. I have not watched a movie with her yet, but hope to soon!

You can link up with any of us!

Some guidelines.

1. For Bloggers, you can link unlimited posts related to books and reading. They can be older posts or newer posts. These can be posts about what you’re reading, book reviews, books you’ve added to your shelf, reading habits, what you’ve been reading, about trips to the bookstore, etc. You get the drift.

2. Link to a specific blog post (URL of a specific post, not just your website). Feel free to link up any older posts that may need some love and attention, too.

3. Please visit at least two other bloggers on this list and comment on their posts. Have fun! Interact! Get some book recommendations.

4. Readers can click the blue button below to visit blog posts.

5. If you add a link you are giving me permission to share and link back to your post(s).

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter
https://fresh.inlinkz.com/js/widget/load.js?id=c0efdbe6b4add43dd7ef

Book review: Murder, She Wrote, Aloha Betrayed by Donald Bain

Aloha Betrayed, a Murder, She Wrote book by Donald Bain and “Jessica Fletcher,” is the 41st book in the 63-book series. Bain wrote 47 of those books.

This is the fifth book I’ve read from this series and, no, I have not read these books in order, and I don’t feel you need to.

This was a fun, slower paced mystery and my only complaint is that there were a couple of plot points left hanging at the end and that Bain seems to have done that on purpose.

He left us not totally sure if the victim was a totally good person or not but mainly making us think she was being manipulated in some way, while not totally confirming if that was true or not.

Here is a quick description of the book from the publisher:

Jessica is on the Hawaiian island of Maui, giving a lecture at Maui College on community involvement in police investigations—a subject she knows well. Her co-lecturer is legendary retired detective Mike Kane, a behemoth of a man who shares his love of Hawaiian lore, legends and culture with Jessica.

Sadly, all the talking stops when the body of a colleague is found at the rocky foot of a cliff.

Mala Kapule was a botanist and popular professor at the school, known for her activism and efforts on behalf of the volcanic crater Haleakala. The high altitude crater is already the site of an observatory, but plans to place the world’s largest solar telescope there split the locals, with Mala fiercely arguing to preserve the delicate ecology of the area. Was someone trying to muffle the protestors? Or was Mala’s killer making a more personal statement?

Now, it’s up to Jessica, along with Mike, to uncover who was driven to silence the scientist…and betray the true meaning of Aloha.

I read some reviews of this book that said the Hawaiian history mixed in with the story slowed the book down but I actually thought the history was naturally woven into the story with information being given to us through conversations between Jessica and the other characters.

It was not an “info dump” by any means.

Donald Bain wrote Jessica very naturally. He was a ghost  writer for many years, and he clearly learned how to write from the point of view of a woman very well. All the books are in first person (from what I have read so far) and I often forget that Jessica is being written by a man.

He writes Jessica as tender, but not too tender, sensitive and concerned, but not too much of either, and more concerned about the feelings of victims and the perpetrators than a male sleuth would most likely be — or at least show.

He also wrote her as someone who thinks deeply about the issues of the world.

“I’ve had many discussions with Seth Hazlitt, and other friends in Cabot Cove about how today’s frenetic lifestyle, fueled by all the technology that surrounds us, takes away from precious time to think. I needed think time. We all need think time to avoid making some of the mistakes we humans are prone to.”

 This is a good one to read if you are looking for a quick escape and not anything super deep — similar to the show.

Book and movie recommendation: The Enchanted April/Enchanted April

I’ve heard about the book The Enchanted April by Elizabeth Von Arnim, and the movie based on it, in the past, but didn’t know what it was about. I wanted to give it a try after I read up on what the book is about earlier in the year.

I ended up really enjoying the book, so I rented the movie this week and liked it as well. The book was released in 1922 and, to me, was progressive in the idea of women needing to have their own free time.

The 1991 movie dropped the “The” and is just called Enchanted April but was exactly like the book, which was nice. They didn’t “modernize” it or add anything inappropriate. It was just subtle with wisps of suggestions of difficult or hard subjects but nothing blatantly dark or heavy, just like the book.

Both the book and the movie left me with a hopeful, uplifted, and relaxed feeling. They were both just sweet escapes that I would definitely read and watch again.

The book and movie are about four English women who rent a medieval castle in Italy for a month. The stay starts as a way for our two main characters, Mrs. Lotty Wilkins and Mrs. Rose Arbuthnot, to escape their mundane lives and dying love life with their husbands.

The two women have seen each other around their part of London but officially meet when Lotty approaches Rose  at a ladies’ club after she sees Rose looking at an ad Lotty also saw for the opportunity to rent the castle. Lotty bluntly tells Rose she knows she is also miserable and needs to do something for herself and suggests they split the cost to rent the castle for a month.

Rose is taken aback and initially declines.

In the book, Lotty pesters Rose a few more times before Rose finally relents and agrees to do it. The movie condensed that timetable a bit.

Lotty is married to a solicitor who is very strict about money, and she feels like he loves money and his work more than her. She’s going to pay for the castle out of her nest egg.

Rose is married to an author who writes memoirs about the mistress of kings and writes under a pen name. Rose is very religious and feels her husband’s work is a sin and she also feels he cares more about it than her, which he does. They have money so she’s going to pay for her part on her own

In the movie, he is attending a party held for him to honor his new book and meets Lady Caroline, which will come into play later.

The two women decide they can’t actually afford the castle on their own and invite two other women to join them – Lady Caroline, who wants to get away from the grabbing paws of lecherous men and Mrs. Fisher, an elderly widow who clings to the past and likes to name-drop all the famous poets and writers she’s known over the years.

One thing I will suggest whether you read the book or watch the movie, is to not go to worst-case scenarios. If you think something “untoward” is going to happen — it isn’t.

There are moments where I worried something painful was going to happen but, thankfully, it didn’t. Despite that there was still enough plot twist in the second half of the book to keep me interested.

This was not a fast book or movie by any means.

They are both very slow but still engaging, at least in my opinion.

The only slight complaint (very slight) I have about the book is how many times Lady Caroline and everyone around her point out how pretty she is. We got it. She’s gorgeous! Sheesh!

It’s an important plot point, though, because Lady Caroline is sick of only being pretty. She’s sick of men always grabbing at her and flirting with her and being all ridiculous around her because of her beauty.

One of the reasons she’s so snappy and snarky during the book is because of a side of her she calls “Scrap”, which is what Von Arnim calls her in the book when her mean or ‘saucy’ side comes out. It was a little confusing when she would switch back and forth with the names but I caught on fairly quickly and thought it was a very creative way to show the reader that Lady Caroline knows she’s sad and twisted upside, that she has this dark side to her, and doesn’t like it.

Yes, there are times the book seemed slightly repetitive (about Lady Caroline’s beauty and her hatred of her beauty — I kept thinking of that shampoo commercial from the 1990s… “Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful.”), but I found the characters and their development so lovable I was willing to skim those paragraphs so I could find out it all turned out.

Polly Walker played Lady Caroline and, well, she is gorgeous.

Joan Plowright was absolutely perfect as Mrs. Fisher and I think that subconsciously I was picturing her already during the sections with Mrs. Fisher as I read the book even though I didn’t even know until I watched the movie that she was in it.

Josie Lawrence plays Lottie and Miranda Richardson portrays Rose. Alfred Molina portrays Lotty’s husband and reminds me of a nicer version of his character in Chocolat. Jim Broadbent is Rose’s husband.

There is a 1935 movie called Enchanted April but after reading about it, I don’t think I’ll watch it. It is based on a play that was based on the book and switches the occupations of the two husbands for some reason.

According to TCM, Von Arnim, who was born in Australia but lived in England, wrote the book while going though a rough time in her life.

The castle in The Enchanted April is called San Salvatore and Von Arnim named it after a castle she was staying in to recover from a domineering marriage to a German count who went to jail for fraud. The movie was actually shot in this same castle, which I just thought was so cool.

After the count died, Von Arnim started an affair with H.G. Wells and later with Sir Francis Russell, who she married impulsively and which ended in disaster. It was after the marriage with Russell ended that she wrote The Enchanted April.

Have you read the book or seen the movie?

What did you think of them?

Sources:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/183504/enchanted-april-1935

 Book Recommendation: Crooked House by Agatha Christie

That won’t make sense until you read the book, so here is a little background on this one, which does not feature one of Christie’s famous detectives.

This book is a standalone novel that starts with the main character Charles Hayward planning to marry Sophia Leonides who he met in Egypt toward the end of the war. They hang out while in Eqypt and correspond some afterward, but drift apart until he returns to England two years later. It’s after his return that he reads in the paper that Sophia’s grandfather has died. He knows it is her grandfather because she once told him all about her family.

“’We live in a crooked little house . . .’”

“I must have looked startled, for she seemed amused, and explained by elaborating the quotation. ‘And they all lived together in a little crooked house,’ That’s us. Not really such a little house either. But definitely crooked — running to gables and halftimbering!”

In this case the crooked little house quote is a play on the nursery rhyme “There Was a Crooked Little Man,” but I am not familiar with that nursery rhyme.

Due to the blitz, Sophia’s extended family was all living in the house with the patriarch, Aristide Leonides, a short Greek man who commanded a lot of presence. Her family includes her younger brother and sister, her parents, her uncle and an aunt by marriage, her grandfather, a great aunt, and a step-grandmother.”

Charles reaches out to her by telegram, and she asks to meet that night at a local restaurant. The connection they had two years ago is still strong, and he still wants to marry her, but she says she can’t marry him now, and maybe never. She believes her grandfather has been murdered, and she doesn’t want to ruin Charles’ reputation as a member of the Diplomatic Service because she feels certain the murder was committed by someone in her family.

The main suspect is her step-grandmother, Brenda, with the tutor for Sophia’s siblings a close second because the family believes the two were having an affair.

In the first part of the book, we get to know the entire family, and it isn’t very pretty. Many of them are selfish and bitter people looking out for themselves, and the ones who don’t seem that way may be putting on an act. Maybe even Sophia is putting on an act. Figuring out who committed the crime will baffle Charles and Scotland Yard, and when you get to the ending — oof. It’s definitely a plot twist, one I saw coming, but still had to find out how and why.

I would definitely recommend this one if you’ve never read Agatha before or even if you have. I think it’s one of her best, and I read today that she called it one of her favorites to write. It is definitely a book that will stick with you over the years, making you think (and shudder a bit) long after you’ve put it down.

Some quotes from it I enjoyed:

“Curious thing, rooms. Tell you quite a lot about the people who live in them.”

***

“I think people more often kill those they love than those they hate. Possibly because only the people you love can really make life unendurable to you.”

***

“I’ve never met a murderer who wasn’t vain… It’s their vanity that leads to their undoing, nine times out of ten. They may be frightened of being caught, but they can’t help strutting and boasting and usually they’re sure they’ve been far too clever to be caught.”

***

“Murder, you see, is an amateur crime… One feels, very often, as though these nice ordinary chaps, had been overtaken, as it were, by murder, almost accidentally. They’ve been in a tight place, or they’ve wanted something very badly, money or a woman – and they’ve killed to get it. The brake that operates with most of us doesn’t operate with them… They continue to be aware that murder is wrong, but they do not feel it. I don’t think, in my experience, that any murderer has really felt remorse… Murderers are set apart, they are ‘different’ – murder is wrong – but not for them – for them it is necessary – the victim has ‘asked for it,’ it was ‘the only way.”