Book recommendation/review: Endless Night by Agatha Christie

The book suggestion for this months’ read for the 2026 Agatha Christie Reading Challenge was Endless Night, a book that Agatha called one of her favorites. It is not a strict “who-done-it” with one of her detectives. Instead, it is a standalone novel that I would call a psychological mystery.

This book was written in about six weeks in 1968 when Agatha was in her 70s.

I’m going to be honest that I was a bit bored in the first part of this book but I just had this feeling that the ending was going to make it all worth it and I was definitely right.

There are some of Agatha’s books where I know that pushing through the more mundane parts of the book will pay off. I felt that way at times in The Secret of Chimneys and By The Pricking of My Thumbs but the endings saved both of those books for me.

This was another one of Agatha’s books where I guessed who was guilty but I didn’t know why they did it or how. I should have figured part of this one sooner than I did but the result would have been the same because the shock for me was more of how Agatha wrote about the villain’s descent into madness than the fact the person was guilty.

Then there was the ending, the final line, where Agatha blurred reality for the guilty party but also for us as the readers. “In the end was my beginning.”

That line made me think about so many of the parts of the book, replaying in my mind where I missed vital clues or thought something  might be a clue, but wasn’t yet sure.

This one was a bit of a mind twist of trying to figure out who was bad, who was good, who was a friend, who was an enemy and who was a lover or who was a killer.

It took a long time for someone to die in this book  — more than halfway through — which to me made the book both boring, at first, and then later, suspenseful. I was constantly wondering who was going to die and when, sometimes wishing she’d hurry up already, but feeling that someone definitely would. The person who did die wasn’t who I expected.

There was superstitious moments throughout the book where I was left wondering if supernatural things were really happening or if someone wanted it to look that way.

It’s hard to talk about the book in depth without spoiling the ending, something I never do in my reviews without a warning, so for now I’ll leave you with a quick description from online and then some quotes from the book.

Online description:

Gipsy’s Acre was a truly beautiful upland site with views out to sea – and in Michael Rogers it stirred a child-like fantasy. There, amongst the dark fir trees, he planned to build a house, find a girl and live happily ever after. Yet, as he left the village, a shadow of menace hung over the land. For this was the place where accidents happened. Perhaps Michael should have heeded the locals’ warnings: ‘There’s no luck for them as meddles with Gipsy’s Acre.’ Michael Rogers is a man who is about to learn the true meaning of the old saying ‘In my end is my beginning.’

The title Endless Night was taken from William Blake’s Auguries of Innocence and describes Christie’s favourite theme in the novel: a “twisted” character, who always chooses evil over good.

Christie finished Endless Night in six weeks, as opposed to the three-four months that most of her other novels took. Despite being in her seventies while writing it, she told an interviewer that being Michael, the twenty-something narrator, “wasn’t difficult. After all, you hear people like him talking all the time.”

The book is dedicated to Christie’s relative “Nora Prichard from whom I first heard the legend of Gipsy’s Acre.” Gipsy’s Acre was a field on the Welsh moors.

Quotes that caught my eye:

“Some are born to sweet delight, Some are born to endless night.”
*

“Born poor doesn’t mean you’ve got to stay poor. Money’s queer. It goes where it’s wanted.”

*

“The house only isn’t enough, you see. It has to have
the setting. That’s just as important. It’s like a ruby or an emerald. A beautiful stone is only a beautiful stone. It doesn’t lead you anywhere further. It doesn’t mean anything, it has no form or significance until it has its setting. And the setting has to have a beautiful jewel to be worthy of it. I take the setting, you see, out of the landscape, where it exists only in its own right. It has no meaning until there is my house sitting proudly like a jewel within its grasp.”

*

“Arrangements. I remember his using the word arrangements. What a hateful word it is and all the things it stands for. The things in life that have grand words – Love – sex – life – death – hate – those aren’t the things that govern existence at all. It’s lots of other pettifogging, degrading things. Things you have to endure, things you never think about until they happen to you.

*

In my end is my beginning … That’s a quotation I’ve often heard people say. It sounds all right—but what does it really mean?”

Have you read this one?

Book recommendation: Sad Cypress by Agatha Christie

Sad Cypress was my read for July for the Christie Reading Challenge for 2026 after I ended up not finishing The Rose and the Yew Tree by Mary Westmacott, which was Agatha’s pseudonym.

I’m glad I switched because I got into Sad Cypress much faster than The Rose and the Yew Tree.

I’m more of a mystery fan than a romantic suspense fan, apparently. Plus, The Rose and the Yew Tree was terribly depressing and slow.

I do think I will go back at some point and try to finish it, however, because it did pique my interest. Just not as much as Sad Cypress.

I did not know that Sad Cypress was a Poirot book when I started it. It is, in fact, the 21st Poirot book.

This one involves jealousy, two murders, and is split into three parts, with the first part from  the main character, Elinor Carlisle’s, point of view, the second focused on Poirot’s investigation, and the third back to Elinor again. Usually we get the point of view of the investigators, sometimes a mixed view of the investigators and the accused, but not usually a mix like this one.

Here is a quick description from Goodreads:

An elderly stroke victim dies without having arranged a will…

Beautiful young Elinor Carlisle stood serenely in the dock, accused of the murder of Mary Gerrard, her rival in love. The evidence was damning: only Elinor had the motive, the opportunity and the means to administer the fatal poison.

Yet, inside the hostile courtroom, only one man still presumed Elinor was innocent until proven guilty; Hercule Poirot was all that stood between Elinor and the gallows.

I also liked this description/short excerpt from Storygraph:

“Elinor flushed: “Will you ask me – again – did I kill Mary Gerrard”?
Poirot rose to his feet. He said quickly, “I shall ask you – nothing. There are things I do not want to know”
But even Hercule Poirot sometimes deceived himself. He did want to know – badly.”

 Poirot is talked into taking on the case by the doctor, Peter Lord, who took care of Elinor’s aunt, the elderly stroke victim. This is a bit of a spoiler, but Peter has a wee crush on Elinor.

I liked how this one was set up with no Poirot at first.  This allowed us to get to know the characters better before the mystery unfolded and he started asking his questions.

No matter what Poirot does in this case, at least to start with, all evidence seems to point to the person already being pinpointed as the guilty person. He wants to help Peter Lord, who has fallen in love with Elinor, but he has to admit that things don’t look good for her.

She herself has given up, sitting in jail, thinking about how the odds are stacked against her, and dreading the court proceedings. There are chapters that include some court drama and it was interesting to see it from the point of view of the accused.

What is great is that Christie showed us Elinor’s point of view but never made it clear, even as we knew her thoughts, whether she was guilty or not, until the end. You’ll have to read this one to find out if she was truly guilty or not.

There were some pretty cool lines in this one, including: 

“You must be an incredibly simple man. Don’t you realize how easy it is for me to lie to you?”

Hercule Poirot said placidly:

“It does not matter.”

She was puzzled. “Not matter?”

“No, for lies, Mademoiselle, tell a listener just as much as truth can. Sometimes they tell more.”

***

”Yes, now it is necessary. Because now I know exactly what I’m looking for. One must understand with the cells of one’s brain before one uses one’s eyes.

****

Eleanor Carlisle said with a touch of weariness, “He has a great reputation.”

“Yes, for defending criminals. I have a great reputation for demonstrating innocence.”

****

At 21, Mary Gerrard was a lovely creature with a kind of wild-rose unreality about her; a long, delicate neck, pale, golden hair, lying close to her exquisitely shaped head and soft, natural waves and eyes a deep, vivid blue.

Have you read this one yet? What did you think?