Springtime in Paris: The Intouchables

Since we couldn’t get to Paris for Spring, Erin from Still Life, With Cracker Crumbs and I have been watching movies this spring that take place in Paris.

This week we watched The Intouchables, a 2012 movie I suggested when I searched for movies that took place in Paris.

This was a rated R movie and had subtitles so it probably wasn’t the best choice for a movie watching event, but I’ll do a little better next time I choose movies. Despite those “drawbacks”, I really enjoyed this movie and felt it was fantastically acted and presented.

This movie was remade in America and retitled The Upside, starring Kevin Hart and Bryan Cranston. I have not seen the remake, but from what I’ve read online and just watching The Upside trailer, the original is much, much better.

The movie is based on the true story of Philippe Pozzo di Borgo and his French-Algerian carer Abdel Sellou, which Philippe wrote about in his 2001 memoir A Second Wind.

In the movie, the characters’ names are Philippe (Francois Cluzet) and Driss (Omar Sy). Driss needs a job after getting out of jail and arrives at Philippe’s mansion after seeing an ad for the job of helping to take care of Philippe, who is a quadriplegic.

Driss doesn’t really want the job, he just needs his paper signed to show his parole officer that he is looking for work. He lets Philippe know that up front and not really in a very polite way. Not much is polite about Driss who has had a rough upbringing and was in jail for stealing.

Driss is in a for a surprise, though, because what Philippe’s assistant and others see as Driss’s rudeness, is refreshing to Philippe and he hires Driss to help care for him. He likes how Driss doesn’t pity him like others in his life. Driss doesn’t care about his disability and treats him as disrespectfully as he does everyone else.

Philippe let’s Driss know that part of the payment for the job includes a room in the mansion.

It’s a win-win for Driss who has recently been kicked out of his family’s home and needs money and a place to stay.

It’s also extremely overwhelming to him. At his family’s home he had to fight for time in the bathroom and to take a shower. At Philippe’s he is given his own bathroom with a large bathtub where he can relax and enjoy himself.

He definitely takes advantage of Philippe’s generosity, but he does begin to take his job seriously as he realizes all that it entails.

As the movie goes on the viewer learns how Philippe became a quadriplegic and more about his family, including his teenage daughter, who Driss often butts  heads with, and how he became so rich.

We also learn more about Driss and his background, how he became involved in crime, his family, and what talents and dreams he has.

An unlikely friendship forms as Driss works to encourage Philippe to loosen up and live life again, while Philippe works to have Driss become a little more responsible.

Driss’s one big effort is to encourage Philippe to go on an in-person date with a woman he only writes letters to. Philippe is much more “sophisticated” and academic than Driss. He is “high society” and proper, but Driss dismisses all of this by asking him things like how he is able to feel pleasure if he can’t feel from the neck down, if  he wants to be in a relationship again, and other off-colored topics that no one else in Philippe’s life would ask.

There is so much I loved about this movie, with the actors being at the top of that list.

They were both absolutely perfect for their roles.

Sly’s subtle and no-so-subtle expressions to convey his emotions were great. Cluzet’s calm delivery in response to Sly’s more boisterous personality was perfection.

The movie has many messages but for me it shoed how a life can be changed when a person is shown that they are worth more and capable of more than they think they are. Driss and Philippe do this for each other.

Philippe shows Driss he can do more than steal and scrape by for a living. He opens Driss’s eyes to his talents and his intelligence and even a kindness Driss didn’t know he had. Driss opens Philippe’s eyes to all that he still has left in life despite his hardships and trials.

Their friendship was unexpected and what both of them needed to survive.

One spoiler I will give to relieve any worries that this movie will take a dark turn and end with Philippe’s death (which was my big worry) is that the real-life Philippe and Driss remained friends for years. Philippe passed away only two years ago at the age of 72, and lived a full, rich life as a philanthropist, friend, father, and husband.

From what I read online, this movie is beloved in France..

According to an article on Wikipedia: Nine weeks after its release in France on 2 November 2011, it became the second highest-grossing French film in France, after the 2008 film Welcome to the Sticks. The film was voted the cultural event of 2011 in France with 52% of votes in a poll by Fnac. Until it was eclipsed in 2014 by Lucy, it was the most-viewed French film in the world with 51.5 million tickets sold.

Film critic Roger Ebert reviewed the film shortly after it came out.

He did and he didn’t like it.

“The success of the film, despite its problems, grows directly from its casting,” Ebert wrote. “Francois Cluzet, who acts only with his face and voice, communicates great feeling. Omar Sy is enormously friendly and upbeat. He reminded me of the African immigrant played by Souleymane Sy Savane in Ramin Bahrani’s “Goodbye Solo” — a film that avoided the traps that “The Intouchables” falls into.”

Ebert continues, “The appeal of a film like this, and it is perfectly legitimate, is that when we begin to feel affection for the characters, what makes them happy makes us happy. Caught up in the flow of events, we allow many assumptions to pass unchallenged. The writer-directors, Olivier Nakache and Eric Toledano, are cheerfully willing to go for broad gags, and their style is ingratiating. But at the end, by looking through the foreground details, what we’re being given is a simplistic reduction of racial stereotypes.”

Umm…okay? He wrote this a year before he died so maybe he was sick at the time.

Did I ever mention that sometimes I thought Ebert was a pretentious jerk? If not, then I have now.

I enjoyed this film immensely and did not see the things Ebert saw.

Have you ever seen this movie or its remake?

You can read Erin’s take on the movie here.

Up next, Erin and I will be watching Charade. We both have a ton going on with our families and have had to cancel the group watch of the movie we had scheduled for this Sunday. Instead, we will be watching it on our own and invite all of you to do the same and share your thoughts on our blog, and then link up here.

If you want to share your thoughts on any of our movies and have links to your blog you can share at the link up below.

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter
https://fresh.inlinkz.com/js/widget/load.js?id=c0efdbe6b4add43dd7ef

February Favorites: movie impression of Amelie

Erin from Still Life, With Cracker Crumbs and I had planned to write about our favorite movies this month and then she took a blogging break and it was a break that I realized I needed to because I’ve been spreading myself way too thin lately.

Erin has mentioned the movie Amelie a few times in the last year or so as being one of her favorite movies so this past weekend I suggested that I watch it since she was already watching it with her hubby and that we write about it today.

She, of course, readily agreed.

Amelie, for those not familiar, is a French film – so yes, I had to read subtitles because I am not fluent in French. It is about a young waitress who was raised by introverted parents who thought she was sick as a child and kept her inside most of her life. It was released in 2001 and the full name of the movie in France is The Fabulous Destiny of Amélie Poulain. Audrey Tautuo plays Amelie. It is directed by Jean Pierre Jeunet.

When she grows up she is very imaginative and begins to work behind the scenes to improve the lives of others. In the process, she might even improve her own. She begins to help others to combat her own loneliness.

This is a very quirky film with quirky camera angles and quirky writing and acting. Quirky is not a bad term in my book, in case you are wondering. I am a fan of quirky.

What is quirky about the film?

The writing, the camera angles, as I mentioned above and in how the narrator talks in present tense for part of the movie and then Amelie breaks the third wall to talk to us about her life in just one scene and then it is back to the narrator. I love when movies break “the rules” so to speak and breaking the third wall is one of those ways. If you don’t know what breaking the third wall means, it is when a character looks directly at the camera and speaks to the audience.

The movie features beautiful, vintage scenery throughout. The backgrounds are picturesque in an urban art style and the entire movie has a slight yellow tone like vintage film to give it a warm feeling. The main colors in the film (green, yellow, and red) are inspired by the paintings of the Brazilian artist Juarez Machado, according to IMDb.

Stories weave in and out of the main narrative of Amelie’s life, starting with her search to find the owner of a small box of mementos she finds in the wall in her bathroom and continuing when she works to return a book of photos from photo booths around the city so she can meet the man who collects the photos.

Each story is a life that Amelie touches and improves and each time she feels more alive and less isolated. Each character she interacts with is also strange and a bit eccentric, and the camera angles exaggerate these facts and the intricacies of Amelie’s imagination. She works to improve the lives of everyone around her, including her father who she encourages to travel the world by sending him photographs of his gnome in different locations around the world.

Eventually, helping others will inspire her to bring happiness to her own life.

There is only one person whose life she sort of messes with as revenge, but he deserves it. Trust me. And harassing him helps to improve the life of another person so it sort of evens out.


According to a couple of sources online, Jeunet said he originally wrote the role of Amélie for the English actress Emily Watson.  Watson didn’t speak strong French, however, and then she started shooting Gosford Park instead. Jeunet then rewrote the screenplay for a French actress. The film was shot in Paris for the most part with some studio shots filmed in Germany.

Tautou was nominated for a BAFTA for Best Actress for her role. She was 24 when the film was released.

Trivia on IMbD states that graffiti and trash had to be cleared from shots in Paris to keep the film’s fantastical feeling. This was sometimes a difficult task for staff.

Amelie has a 90 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes, which is a good thing if you don’t know. People love it, in other words. The movie was made into a musical on Broadway in 2015 and it was rereleased this year in theaters for Valentine’s Day. I have no idea if the musical was any good or not.

The movie is definitely fantastical – and a bit bizarre in places, to me, but not so bizarre that it’s creepy. More like whimsical bizarre. Not sure if that makes sense to some but it does in my brain.

One review I read of this on Rotten Tomatoes summed up some of my feelings about the movie: “I feel like it’s a beautiful love letter to the introverts out there with wonderfully magical imaginations who find it hard to connect to people in real life.”

This was a unique film that I don’t think I would have watched on my own, or discovered at all if it wasn’t for Erin’s suggestion. I will warn anyone offended by some sex and language, that this is a rated R movie. Neither is extreme but it still resulted in a R rating.

 I know Erin will have a lot more to share about it in her post, which you can find here: https://crackercrumblife.com/2024/02/15/february-favorites-movie-thoughts-amelie/

Have you ever seen Amelie? What was your impression of it?